Apple’s Services business is as big as Tesla, Morgan Stanley, J&J, Pepsi, Disney and many more

Apple reported earnings for its Fiscal Q1-2025 (Dec-2024) quarter last Thursday. Overall, it was a ‘good’ quarter. It was not a blowout but it reported an all-time high in revenue and most impressively, gross margin hit 46.9%.

But the most impressive performance came from its Services business which generated $26.3 billion during the quarter. On an annual basis, Services is now generating over $96 billion.

That makes its services business as big as companies like Tesla. It is nearly twice the size of Nike now.

Keep in mind, Services is growing at 14% AND carries a gross margin of 75%, well above the company average of 47%.

More to come here…

Why we celebrate Derek Jeter...

**Originally published on May 14, 2017

Tonight, Derek Jeter's number 2 will be retired by the New York Yankees - it will be the last single digit number retired by the franchise. Having your number retired by such a storied franchise alongside legends like Babe Ruth, Mickey Mantle, Joe DiMaggio, Lou Gehrig (and many more) is an incredible recognition, but it leaves so much on the table of what his career meant to the modern day professional athlete as the 'ultimate role model'.

Yes, Derek Jeter has first-ballot Hall of Fame stats - 3,465 hits (6th all time & most by any shortstop ever), a .310 batting average, 14 All-Star Selections, 5 Gold Gloves, 5 Silver Slugger Awards, 2 Hank Aaron Awards, 1 Roberto Clemente Award, and 5 World Championships. But those stats do not adequately articulate why we, even as non-Yankees fans (as I am not), still rooted for Derek Jeter.

  • 20 Years in One Uniform: Derek Jeter played 20 major league seasons for 1 franchise. Today, you'll be lucky to find a player with that type of longevity who hasn't played for 3-4 franchises. Jeter displayed a unique sense of loyalty that few players today care about. Was he paid well? Absolutely. But, all sports superstars are paid well, yet very few exhibit the loyalty of a Derek Jeter or even a Kobe Bryant.

    Those 20 years weren't always a bowl of cherries either - his 5 championships were split between two different regimes - the Joe Torre era and now the Joe Girardi era. And he played for a very hands-on owner that was not shy about blasting his own players and coaches in the media.
     

  • Scandal-Free Career: Derek Jeter entered the Major Leagues in 1996, which was sandwiched between the baseball strike that lost the sport many fans in 1994 and the now infamous 'artificially powered' home run derby year of 1998 where Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa both broke the single-season home run record held by Roger Maris. He joined the league at a time when the media's coverage of athletes started to delve far beyond what they did on-the-field.

    Derek Jeter played his entire career during an era of scandal-after-scandal in professional sports - Performance Enhancing Drugs (PEDs), Adultery, Rape, Murders, Multi-million dollar contracts given to players whose playing abilities turned out to be worth nothing, and the list goes on. Yet, Derek Jeter was never so much as implicated in ANY scandal. Did he date a lot of women? Yes, but the difference between Jeter and so many other pro athletes when it comes to having flings with many women is that he was not married - a subtle but important distinction.
     

  • 'The Captain': The modern day sports locker room has become a reporter's paradise for information that is intended to send subtle, yet very public messages about players who can't get along with teammates. It would be very difficult, if not impossible, to find a story where Jeter's name was mentioned in the context of negativity from a teammate, nor will you find a story where Jeter publicly criticized a teammate.

    Even when A-Rod was going through his steroids scandal, Jeter handled it very delicately by talking, but not taking aim - he provided his views on PEDs, but he did not take it to the point of criticizing A-Rod through public channels. Jeter was known as 'The Captain' for a reason - he was a consummate leader who worked hard at the game, and always let his play on the field do the talking.

It is hard to find really great role models in sports today who perform brilliantly and haven't been involved in some scandal or moved from team-to-team looking for better money. When history looks back at this era of sports, there will be one name that overwhelmingly takes the spotlight - Michael Jordan. And there's nothing wrong with that - Jordan was the most successful and dominant player who hit his peak at that perfect time when sports transcended the boundaries into media, entertainment, and business (e.g., Nike Air Jordan's). But, if Jordan had started his career in 1996 as opposed to 1984, I can guarantee you that his image would have been significantly tarnished by his off-the-field behavior. We saw a glimpse of it with the gambling, but let's face it, that was not Jordan's only vice. Derek Jeter will be as underappreciated 50 years from now as he is today. 

"Derek Jeter was not perfect, but if we put who he was into the context of this generation of professional athletes, he was about as close as it gets...and that's why we Celebrate and RE2PECT him."

HALL OF FAME: In 2020, Derek Jeter received 396 of a possible 397 votes from the Baseball Writers’ Association of America (BBWAA), falling just 1 vote shy of being the second unanimous selection to the most prestigious honor that one can achieve in Major League Baseball.

How the NCAA Transfer Portal facilitates illogical decisions for 'student' athletes

0.023% - those are the current odds that a high school football player in this country ever plays in the NFL. Yet, when you look at how kids are using the transfer portal, you would think that number is not 0.023% but 23.0%.

The Transfer Portal facilitates a student athlete's ability to change schools & avoid any penalty (you used to have to sit out a full season to restore eligibility). Now, you can transfer at the end of one season and play the next. It is not uncommon to see kids who are on their 3rd or 4th schools. NIL aside, the transfer portal is great for creating 'parity' in college football but don't think for a second that it comes without a cost.

WHY SHOULD I WORK ON MY GAME & GET BETTER TO 'WIN' MY POSITION WHEN I CAN 'INHERIT' IT ELSEWHERE?

You rarely see kids actually putting in the work to win a job anymore b/c why should they? Receiving something is far easier than earning something. But that's what the transfer portal facilitates - the idea that a kid who 'inherits' everything has any notion or will to work for anything. If you don't like your job after 4 months...leave.

WHAT'S THE HARM IN MORTGAGING MY FUTURE FOR A 0.023% CHANCE AT PLAYING IN THE NFL?

If a kid is on his 3rd or 4th school, my guess is (and I know I'm going out on a limb here) that academics haven't been a priority. So now we have more college football players graduating into the 'real world' with no academic foundation AND no sense of what it takes to 'earn a job'. It is sad and a future we are solely responsible for perpetuating. I am not saying a kid who has been with 4 schools in 5 years isn't academic; I am saying the chances of building the mentality and foundation needed to succeed in this world are likely diluted by a nomadic approach towards such a formative period in life.

BUT NIL NIL NIL.

Yes, I get the NIL money thing. But if anybody saw what happened at UNLV this year, it should be a wakeup call about how NIL works - it is an unstructured and unregulated way to lure kids in with little-to-no legal guarantee on the part of the ppl luring them in. Do you really think these boosters are putting up big $ for NIL if the kid does not perform on the field? For every big NIL deal, there's usually a lot of fine print that makes the deal look far better than the payoff. There is a handful of very select players that will make $millions with NIL - those are also the same exact players that comprise the 0.023% referenced above.

The NCAA is there to protect "student"-athletes. The transfer portal is not protecting anybody except the boosters who fund these programs. It is like Venture Capital - VC firms are willing to 'throw' $1M at 50 startups because they only need one to hit for that "spreading" to create a huge ROI. Well in this case the 49 that don't work out are not defunct startups; they are college 'graduates' in the workforce. Is that good policy?

The 'Keyser Soze' of Boxing

Republished - originally published in 2014.

For those familiar with the Kevin Spacey thriller, The Usual Suspects, the name 'Keyser Soze' should ring a bell. Soze is a seemingly mythical character working behind-the-scenes whose 'ruthlessness and influence have acquired a legendary, even mythical status.' He is never truly seen and those who work for him follow his directions like puppets hung from strings.

Al Haymon - rare public appearance

Over the past ten years, the boxing world has seen the rise of its own 'Keyser Soze', in the form of a boxing manager / promoter named Al Haymon. Haymon is a Harvard graduate, and was long known as a music promoter prior to his entry into the sport of boxing. The parallels between Haymon and Soze run large, in the sense that he is a 'behind-the-scenes' guy who wields a disproportionate amount of power in boxing - for example, he's able to get fighters that would generally not be considered Pay-Per-View (PPV) fighters onto PPV cards. He's built up fighters like Adrien Broner with mediocre / above-average boxing talent into superstars.

Known as boxing's 'power-broker', Haymon has been able to build a stable of fighters under-contract that represent the best-and-brightest that the sport has to offer. Unfortunately for all of us, he wields his power in a way that protects his fighters from the best fights that can be made by way of blocking potential blockbuster showdowns. Haymon fighters have little-to-no say in the fights they engage in and thus, we are often left with lopsided victories, 'paper champions', and general mediocrity.

Adrien "The Problem" Broner is perhaps the best manifestation of Haymon, the puppet-master. Broner is a cocky, flashy young fighter coined 'the next Mayweather' (he even refers to Floyd as 'big-brother'). And for a while, everybody had no reason to doubt this kid - he looked tremendous moving his way up the various divisions and becoming a three-time world champion. This was all working great until Broner had to fight a real fighter - Marcos Maidana - yes, the same Maidana that Mayweather just beat. Not only did Maidana put Broner on the canvas twice, he exposed what many had long-suspected, Broner is a fraud. Broner's post-fight interview after his one-sided victory against a 'nobody' on Saturday's Mayweather under-card fight demonstrated a kid who is not "the problem", but rather "a problem", and luckily for all of us, the WBC agreed and has suspended Broner for the comments.

Like Soze, Haymon is rarely seen in public and uses his right-hand man, Sam Watson, as his public representative - analogous to the role of 'Kobayashi' in The Usual Suspects. Haymon's role in the sport is continuing to grow - he has strong alliances with Floyd Mayweather Jr., Leonard Ellerbe and perhaps most-troubling, Golden Boy Promotion's (GBP) CEO, Richard Schaefer. Schaefer has been engaged in a very public dispute with GBP's majority shareholder and namesake, Oscar De La Hoya. Additionally, Schaefer has publicly declared that he will not deal with Bob Arum / Top Rank - boxing's other main promoter who handles Manny Pacquiao, Timothy Bradley, and a host of other top talent.

Being an obstructionist by protecting second-rate fighters and giving them massive paydays they don’t deserve while preventing the public from seeing the best fights at the right time DOES NOT make you a genius.

Given these dynamics, it is unlikely that we will see any Arum fighters face any Haymon fighters, which includes any possibility of a Mayweather / Pacquiao showdown - we all lose. Additionally, there is a very real possibility that Schaefer pulls the carpet out from underneath De La Hoya and defects to build a new company with Haymon, Mayweather, and Ellerbe. If that were to happen, I see no other outcome than for De La Hoya to join forces with Arum (whom he recently reconciled with). Such a development would only further divide the current landscape of boxing and allow for the creation of more 'Adrien Broners' - mediocre fighters handed disproportionate and unearned opportunities.

But like what we've seen happen with Broner, there is only so much protection you can afford these fighters. Eventually, they are going to have to fight real talent and the cream will rise to the top.

"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he did not exist. And like that...he is gone."

What I learned from TSMC - the world's leader in advanced semiconductor fabrication

I recently met with a product executive from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (“TSMC”) - the world’s leader in advanced semiconductor fabrication who can call companies like Apple and Nvidia (amongst many others) as its partners. TSMC has grown into nearly a $1 Trillion dollar company that has achieved revenue growth CAGR of over 15% for nearly 30 consecutive years.

TSMC is a ‘pure-play’ fabricator - they do not design chips; the company is strictly focused on fabricating the designs of others. Simply put, without TSMC, companies like Apple and Nvidia would have nothing more than silicon designs on paper. It is the first fabricator to successfully produce process nodes of 3 nanometers (NM’s). I am not an engineer, but it is my understanding that the smaller the node of the processor, the more efficient the chip is (speed, power efficiency, etc.).

In 2020, TSMC committed over $10 billion of investment to build fabrication facilities outside of Phoenix, AZ - the actual investment is estimated to be nearly triple the original amount as it seeks geographical diversification due to geopolitical tensions in the Asia-Pacific region.

The TSMC Arizona project has not come without controversy. The company’s executive leaders have made a number of incendiary comments about the American workforce lacking both the skills and work-ethic needed to successfully achieve the promise of its investment.

As a shareholder of TSMC, I simply wanted to understand what enabled TSMC to achieve its current market leadership position and hold the keys to the advanced semiconductor gates of possibility.

Our customers are our partners and we rely on their input - we don’t know everything

TSMC was built on a sense of humility - it took a lot of time, investment and trust to build relationships that remain the core of its financial success today. It works hand-in-hand with its partners on setting and managing expectations on such cutting edge technology that it must advance every year to maintain its market position. For example, Apple was multi-sourcing its own silicon fabrication for a number of years to companies like Samsung, but the Samsung relationship was riddled with a number of issues (including tons of litigation around other issues) that prevented it from ever earning the trust it needed to really capture Apple’s commitment. TSMC brought a level of focus and expertise to the table that Apple wanted:

“We come to the table with a very simple message - semiconductor fabrication is all that we do - we are the best at what we do because of our focus. But make no mistake, winning Apple’s trust was all about proving [not just saying] we could deliver the best product at-scale and meet their deadlines.”

“Additionally, TSMC is very proud of working hand-in-hand with the executive leadership teams of its partners - we do not just take their designs and run with them; we always engage with our partners to understand and manage expectations - we work in an industry where production yield is significantly low at the beginning of a new process and those yields scale with production volume to drive cost-per-unit down. We need to know their product timelines so we can scale yields to a level that sufficiently meets their product rollouts and unit forecasts. It is a dynamic and day-to-day relationship that requires honesty and at-times, humility. We are best off by building trust with our partners - there is so much media in the world today, we are best off when we maintain direct communication so our partners hear from us.”

We understand our value in the value-chain

“We are the best in the world at advanced semiconductor fabrication. We do not try to be everything to everybody. We are not designers of semiconductors. The best thing that TSMC ever did was recognize that fabrication was a strategic differentiator when most of our competitors believed that the chip design was where you would win. Many viewed fabrication as a commoditized process; we viewed fabrication as an equal part in commercializing the best chips in the world. But, it took a vision many years ago to understand that and people even within the company did not always see it. There was a time when fabrication was not seen as a strategic piece of the value chain. Our leadership had the foresight into what chips would become in the future and the expertise required to translate designs into efficient and powerful silicon,”

We try to focus solely on product, not process

“TSMC is the company it is today because of an unrelenting commitment to our product. “We try to remain lean and we strive for a collaborative culture. However, we are not obsessed with committees, endless meetings about meetings, and we don’;t bring people into discussions that they do not need to be a part of. We want our people to focus on what they are great at and that requires organizational discipline. Our partners want the best product possible and we must align around that goal to be successful. We do not have the benefit of wasting time on worrying about internal processes - we have a formula that works and we see no reason to make it more complex than it needs to be.”

The comments about the American workforce were not taken well - we understand that cultural differences exist. We are in the business of making the best product possible and that requires a level of skill and commitment that we will not compromise on. We said what needed to be said.

“We made the investment in Arizona knowing there would be challenges of building fabrication facilities in the middle of a desert thousands of miles from our roots. Yes, we were caught off-guard by some of the deficiencies in personnel, but we always view these relationships at partnerships that require dedication to make them work. We are seeing progress and we have become much better with merging both corporate and geographic cultural differences. When we invest, it is not simply about deploying capital It is also about deploying our people to be on-the-ground. That is what true partners do - they demonstrate mutual interest with both financial and human capital. We are not there yet, but we have made significant progress in bridging the divides that we saw early on. We need this to work and are committed to making it work.”

If we do right by our partners, we will continue to be successful

“We report our earnings just like every other publicly-traded company. However, we don’t manage our business by quarter - if we did that, we would not be where we are today. We invest where we think strategic advantage exists and we are willing to give up short-term gains for long-term results. We see companies that are managing to each 90-day period and it shows - there is a lack of strategy when every decision is made on short-term gain - it is very tactical and you cannot be the best by simply managing with tactics.”

“We never let the ‘noise’ of the market interfere with the focus of our company. That is how we manage our business and the results are a reflection of that clarity.”